The ways of peace are largely untried, but successful more often than we think.
I can almost remember the moment (I was in my late 40's) when I learned that the Cuban Missile Crisis was settled not by President Kennedy’s public showdown behavior, but rather was settled with a behind-the-scenes peaceful negotiation.
I was always taught that the Crisis ended because Mr. Kennedy wouldn’t back down. I was shocked to learn that the United States actually negotiated a settlement whereby we would withdraw our missiles from Turkey and the then USSR would withdraw its missiles from Cuba.
I felt so betrayed because what I had been taught was a lie and it is a costly lie. That lie led me and lots of others to believe that the only way to deal with world enemies was with force and the threat of force, when, in fact, the situation was resolved not by force, but by peaceful negotiation, by talking to our enemy, by making concessions and compromises.
We live in a time when the word ‘compromise’ has become a dirty word, where everything is tinged with the language of righteousness. And the rightness of our cause, whatever it may be, becomes the justification for force.
Thus this president, along with every president I can remember, whatever party they belong to, speaks openly about protecting not only Americans and American land, but also American interests around the world. A public Pentagon document planning through 2020 I once read refers to military readiness to protect American ‘interests’ around the world.
And now, we’re talking about military action, directly or by proxy, against Iran -- not around the nuclear threat, but against their stated intention to blockade the Strait of Hormuz (where much of our oil flows through Iran’s territory).
Thus I am, as a citizen, literally required to ask, “How many people am I willing to kill in order to drive my car?” I know it’s not that simple, but the idea of self-defense has been expanded to mean not merely the protection of my life, but also of my way of life.
I don’t like or excuse Iran’s behavior. But their bad behavior does not justify mine. That, I think, lies at the heart of the Golden Rule.
I can almost remember the moment (I was in my late 40's) when I learned that the Cuban Missile Crisis was settled not by President Kennedy’s public showdown behavior, but rather was settled with a behind-the-scenes peaceful negotiation.
I was always taught that the Crisis ended because Mr. Kennedy wouldn’t back down. I was shocked to learn that the United States actually negotiated a settlement whereby we would withdraw our missiles from Turkey and the then USSR would withdraw its missiles from Cuba.
I felt so betrayed because what I had been taught was a lie and it is a costly lie. That lie led me and lots of others to believe that the only way to deal with world enemies was with force and the threat of force, when, in fact, the situation was resolved not by force, but by peaceful negotiation, by talking to our enemy, by making concessions and compromises.
We live in a time when the word ‘compromise’ has become a dirty word, where everything is tinged with the language of righteousness. And the rightness of our cause, whatever it may be, becomes the justification for force.
Thus this president, along with every president I can remember, whatever party they belong to, speaks openly about protecting not only Americans and American land, but also American interests around the world. A public Pentagon document planning through 2020 I once read refers to military readiness to protect American ‘interests’ around the world.
And now, we’re talking about military action, directly or by proxy, against Iran -- not around the nuclear threat, but against their stated intention to blockade the Strait of Hormuz (where much of our oil flows through Iran’s territory).
Thus I am, as a citizen, literally required to ask, “How many people am I willing to kill in order to drive my car?” I know it’s not that simple, but the idea of self-defense has been expanded to mean not merely the protection of my life, but also of my way of life.
I don’t like or excuse Iran’s behavior. But their bad behavior does not justify mine. That, I think, lies at the heart of the Golden Rule.
Thanks a lot for sharing this with all folks you actually know what you are speaking about! Bookmarked. Kindly additionally discuss with my website =). We could have a link trade contract among us!
ReplyDeleteRuland MWSP-16-SS Two-Piece Clamping Shaft Collar, Double Wide, Stainless Steel, Metric, 16mm Bore, 34mm OD, 29mm Width
Thanks!David.
DeleteWow! This could be one particular of the most helpful blogs We've ever arrive across on this subject. Basically Wonderful. I am also a specialist in this topic so I can understand your hard work.
ReplyDeleteSorel Women's Cate The Great Boot
Thanks Clifford - continuing to be a work in progress!
ReplyDelete